Comparative analysis of traditional and interactive teaching methods

https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i7.8727

Authors

  • Ting Li Kyrgyz State University named after Ishenaly Arabaev, 720000, Bishkek, the Kyrgyz Republic.
  • Sartbekova Nurzhan Koodoevna Kyrgyz State University named after Ishenaly Arabaev, 720000, Bishkek, the Kyrgyz Republic.
  • Dehao Li Kyrgyz State Technical University Named After I.Razzakov, 720044, Bishkek, the Kyrgyz Republic.
  • Yixiu Li Broadway Elementary School, 1015 Lincoln Blvd, Venice, CA 90291, USA. https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7442-9117

In the face of current problems in educational practice, such as insufficient student participation in class, low efficiency in knowledge internalization, and limited development of higher-order thinking skills, this study first constructed a three-dimensional evaluation framework. Subsequently, a structured classroom observation scale was designed, along with a cognitive load scale and a delayed post-test. Finally, a standardized test was combined with an open-ended problem-solving task. The experimental results indicated that the interactive teaching method significantly improved class participation. Specifically, the frequency of questions asked in the interactive class was 2.4 times higher than in the traditional class (p < 0.001). The cognitive load experiment revealed that the average cognitive load during the 12th class was 53.85±3.32. Regarding knowledge transfer ability, scores for basic transfer tasks and advanced transfer tasks in the interactive teaching class were 20.49±3.67 and 20.72±7.19, respectively. These findings demonstrate that the interactive teaching method effectively promotes students' internalization and transfer of knowledge by increasing classroom interaction and reducing cognitive load, particularly in fostering higher-order thinking skills.

Section

How to Cite

Li, T. ., Koodoevna, S. N. ., Li, D. ., & Li, Y. . (2025). Comparative analysis of traditional and interactive teaching methods. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(7), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i7.8727

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Dimension Badge

Download

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles

Published

2025-07-09